I watched the Psychic Detectives on Sky TV yesterday evening. It is the programme where three psychics have a go at solving a mystery by using their psychic ability.
In this particular one, a man had disappeared and his family wanted closure has there had been no resolving of the mystery. His body had never been found, although one of his feet was eventually discovered.
The psychics appeared to work separately but as they spoke you got the impression that they had been together, at least some of the time, to discuss the case.
All three appeared to work differently but often came up with similar information. There was a lot in common with the evidence.
The mother and sister were with one of the psychics and another of them had photographs. The third one worked with a map and some equipment.
Since the person disappeared in 2000, and the foot was later found, but there has not been anything else, so you could safely assume, psychic or not, that he was now dead.
They came to the conclusion that the young man died in water and possibly drowned, though two of the psychics had sensed a blow to the back of the head. Maybe he hit his head as he fell in? They didn’t think he was murdered.
Remarkably, this scant information put the family at ease. They said they felt better knowing where he had ended up! What do you think about this? Would it satisfy you?